![]() jpg 2mb) I wish to turn into a continuous timelapse movie. Faster GPU eases playback, and may even help decoding a movie, as some load can sometimes be shifted from CPU to GPU, in particular H.264 video. This may cause big files, which may be a bit tougher to decode on playback.Īnother thing is GPU, the graphics chip that controls what is displayed. Image sequence movies may have less temporal compression (consecutive frames may have little in common), compared to a regular movie, making it harder to compress well. Is it almost full? Is the movie very fragmented? A copy of the movie may play smoother, as Mac OS X tries to use large continuous blocks on the hard disk for transferred big files, resulting in quasi-defragmenting, when possible. Not sure if that is the case, but you should find out if this applies to your situation.Īlso check the hard disk. About a third of the way through the film starts jittering (not a smooth motion) Increased RAM is good for a lot of things, but it won't help stuttering playback on a good movie if the processor can't keep up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |